On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD and Alpine A290 GT 160kW have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
469 €per year
15,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.13 € per 100 km · 2 345 kWh per year
| Profile | Split | AA · Model 3 | BB · A290 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City70 / 25 / 5 | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 472 € | 436 € | 36 € · A290 |
| Mixed30 / 50 / 20 | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 469 € | 456 € | Nearly level |
| Long-distance10 / 40 / 50 | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 486 € | 474 € | Nearly level |
Cumulative saving for the A290 GT 160kW
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD and Alpine A290 GT 160kW have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD offers more range: 600 km vs 380 km for Alpine A290 GT 160kW (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Alpine A290 GT 160kW is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.