On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi S e-tron GT is about 20% cheaper than the Tesla Model S P100D with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
496 €per year
16,5 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,31 € per 100 km · 2 480 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Model | S | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 608 € | 422 € | 186 € | S |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 614 € | 496 € | 117 € | S |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 618 € | 587 € | 31 € | S |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi S e-tron GT is about 20% cheaper than the Tesla Model S P100D with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Audi S e-tron GT offers more range: 609 km vs 507 km for Tesla Model S P100D (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Audi S e-tron GT is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.