Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 5,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model S 85 | Giulia Veloce | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s | 5,25 s+0,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s | 13,56 s+0,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,17 s | 24,89 s+0,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 201 km/h | 240 km/h−39 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,82 kg/hp | 5,68 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model S 85 | Giulia Veloce |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,67 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,78 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,46 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,39 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,43 s | 12,32 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,22 s | 21,59 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s | 13,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,17 s | 24,89 s |
| Top speed | 201 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 362 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 599 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Giulia Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.26 s versus 5.75 s for the Model S 85. Despite lacking instant torque, 280 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Giulia Veloce leads by 0.49 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Veloce is doing 135 km/h against 137 km/h for the Model S 85. The gap is 0.44 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Veloce crosses the line in 13.56 s versus 13.94 s. The 0.38 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Model S 85 maxes out at 201 km/h while the Giulia Veloce keeps accelerating towards 240 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.30 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Veloce finishes in 24.89 s versus 25.17 s, with just 0.28 s to spare. The Model S 85 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model S 85 is capped at 201 km/h, the Giulia Veloce at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.41 seconds. The 0.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 5,75 s).
Model S 85 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,75 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model S 85 : 362 hp, ratio 5,82 kg/hp. Giulia Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp.
Model S 85 : 201 km/h. Giulia Veloce : 240 km/h.