Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 5,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | 330e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−0,16 s | 5,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−0,11 s | 14,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−0,24 s | 26,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,90 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | 330e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,22 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,15 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 5,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 14,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 27,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 14,23 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 26,25 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 740 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 5.92 s for the 330e. Despite lacking instant torque, 280 hp of power compensates. The 0.16 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 128 km/h for the 330e. The gap is 0.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 14.23 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 26.25 s, with a 0.24 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Stelvio Veloce and the 330e are governed to 230 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.56 seconds. The 0.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 5,92 s).
Stelvio Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. 330e G20: 252 hp, ratio 6,90 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h. 330e G20: 230 km/h.