Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 5,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A290 GTS 192kW | A110 Pure 252 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,51 s | 4,55 s+0,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,81 s | 12,62 s+1,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,18 s | 22,69 s+2,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 247 km/h | 277 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,67 kg/hp | 4,31 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A290 GTS 192kW | A110 Pure 252 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,59 s | 1,34 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,66 s | 2,24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,28 s | 3,55 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,51 s | 4,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 5,87 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,49 s | 9,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,26 s | 14,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,81 s | 12,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,18 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h | 277 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 261 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 479 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | A290 GTS 192kW | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 103 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | A110 Pure 252 | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 Pure 252 hits 100 km/h in 4.56 s versus 5.52 s for the A290 GTS 192kW. Despite lacking instant torque, 256 hp of power compensates. At this point, the A110 Pure 252 leads by 0.96 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 Pure 252 is doing 151 km/h against 138 km/h for the A290 GTS 192kW. The gap is 0.73 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 Pure 252 crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 13.81 s. The 1.19 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 Pure 252 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 185 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 Pure 252 finishes in 22.69 s versus 25.18 s, with a 2.49 s lead.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.16 seconds. The 0.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 5,51 s).
A290 GTS 192kW passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,51 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A290 GTS 192kW : 261 hp, ratio 5,67 kg/hp. A110 Pure 252 : 256 hp, ratio 4,31 kg/hp.
A290 GTS 192kW : 247 km/h. A110 Pure 252 : 277 km/h.