Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 7,44 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A3 allstreet | Cooper E FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,44 s | 7,20 s+0,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,37 s+0,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,14 s−0,79 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+70 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,89 kg/hp | 7,58 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A3 allstreet | Cooper E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,96 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,30 s | 3,28 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,46 s | 5,36 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,44 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,30 s | 9,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,02 s | 17,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,29 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,14 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Cooper E FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.20 s versus 7.44 s for the A3 allstreet. At this point, the Cooper E FWD leads by 0.24 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cooper E FWD is doing 124 km/h against 120 km/h for the A3 allstreet. The gap is 0.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper E FWD crosses the line in 15.37 s versus 15.61 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Cooper E FWD maxes out at 160 km/h while the A3 allstreet keeps accelerating towards 230 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.20 s.
Around 726 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the A3 allstreet overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 70 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the A3 allstreet finishes in 28.13 s versus 28.93 s. The 0.79 s delta in favour of the A3 allstreet shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the Cooper E FWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.89 kg/hp vs 7.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 7,44 s).
A3 allstreet passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,44 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A3 allstreet : 204 hp, ratio 7,89 kg/hp. Cooper E FWD : 184 hp, ratio 7,58 kg/hp.
A3 allstreet : 230 km/h. Cooper E FWD : 160 km/h.