Among the 5 compacts plug-in hybrid 2023–2027, the A3 allstreet ranks 1st of 5 in Electric WLTP range (128 km, behind the Audi A3 allstreet), 1st of 5 in Combined range (842 km, behind the Audi A3 allstreet), Thermal cons. estimated (5.6 L/100, behind the Audi A3 allstreet), 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the Audi A3 Sportback TFSI e 200 kW).
A3 allstreet
204 hp, 128 km electric range, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 5 compacts plug-in hybrid 2023–2027, the A3 allstreet ranks 1st of 5 in Electric WLTP range, 1st of 5 in Combined range, Thermal cons. estimated, 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.4s
VMax 225 km/h
Total range
842km
of which 128 km elec
Battery + Tank
19.7kWh
+ 40 L tank
Full specifications Audi A3 allstreet
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,498 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | FWD |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 19.7 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 128 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 40 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 12,9 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 1,4 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 5,6 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
| EV range motorway | 122 km |
| Total range motorway | 842 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,4 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,353 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,628 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm |
| Height | 1,457 mm |
| Boot | 280 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,610 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 31 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 5 compacts plug-in hybrid, the A3 allstreet combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (best in segment), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the A3 allstreet through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Home-to-office commute up to 60 km in pure electric. Overnight charging is sufficient. 1st of 5 in Electric WLTP range (128 km), 1st of 5 in Combined range (842 km), Thermal cons. estimated (5.6 L/100).
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback TFSI e 200 kW (1st with 6.3 s) takes the lead.
In the city: 128 km pure electric (best in segment)
With a full battery, the A3 allstreet drives in pure electric mode for the first 128 km WLTP — placing it 1st of 5 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Audi A3 allstreet (128 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the A3 allstreet behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the A3 allstreet stands against compacts plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 5 compacts plug-in hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A3 8Y range
Generation 8Y launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 8Y
Popular duels involving the A3 allstreet
Audi A3 allstreet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
128 km WLTP announced — making it the 1st of 5 in autonomie du segment out of 5 models. The reference is the Audi A3 allstreet (128 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.