Over 0–100 km/h, A6 Avant and 320d Touring G20 are neck and neck (6,97 s vs 7,00 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A6 Avant | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,00 s | 6,97 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,02 s−0,03 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,98 s | 27,94 s+0,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 238 km/h+8 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,80 kg/hp | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A6 Avant | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,08 s | 1,16 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 2,20 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,60 s | 4,69 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,00 s | 6,97 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,04 s | 9,95 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,37 s | 18,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 34,70 s | 36,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,02 s | 15,05 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,98 s | 27,94 stight gap |
| Top speed | 238 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d Touring hits 100 km/h in 6.97 s versus 7.00 s for the A6 Avant. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the A6 Avant is doing 117 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw 320d Touring. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A6 Avant crosses the line in 15.02 s versus 15.05 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw 320d Touring maxes out at 230 km/h while the A6 Avant keeps accelerating towards 238 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.03 s.
Around 497 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw 320d Touring overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 8 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring finishes in 27.93 s versus 27.98 s. The 0.05 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the A6 Avant is capped at 238 km/h, the Bmw 320d Touring at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.80 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.76 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A6 Avant and 320d Touring G20 are neck and neck (6,97 s vs 7,00 s, no significant gap).
A6 Avant goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
A6 Avant: 204 hp, ratio 9,80 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
A6 Avant: 238 km/h. 320d Touring G20: 230 km/h.