Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,69 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e-tron GT quattro | iX xDrive50 I20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s−0,55 s | 4,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s−0,57 s | 12,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s−1,46 s | 23,92 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+45 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e-tron GT quattro | iX xDrive50 I20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,08 s | 3,50 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 4,69 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,47 s | 6,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,25 s | 10,39 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,74 s | 16,61 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 12,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 23,92 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 523 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 765 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 585 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the e-tron GT quattro hits 100 km/h in 4.14 s versus 4.69 s for the iX xDrive50. At this point, the e-tron GT quattro leads by 0.55 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the e-tron GT quattro is doing 149 km/h against 144 km/h for the iX xDrive50. The gap is 0.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the e-tron GT quattro crosses the line in 12.36 s versus 12.93 s. The 0.57 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the e-tron GT quattro continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 208 km/h versus 200 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the e-tron GT quattro finishes in 22.46 s versus 23.92 s, with a 1.46 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the iX xDrive50 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.95 kg/hp vs 4.94 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.07 seconds. The 0.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,69 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. iX xDrive50 I20: 523 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. iX xDrive50 I20: 200 km/h.