Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,29 s vs 4,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e-tron GT quattro | Model 3 Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,29 s+0,85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,49 s+0,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 21,21 s+1,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 261 km/h−16 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,03 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e-tron GT quattro | Model 3 Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 0,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,49 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,08 s | 2,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,29 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,47 s | 4,37 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,25 s | 7,66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,74 s | 12,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,49 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 21,21 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 261 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 698 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 836 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.29 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 0.85 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 157 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.49 s versus 12.36 s. The 0.88 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 21.21 s versus 22.46 s, with a 1.25 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the Model 3 Performance at 261 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.95 kg/hp vs 4.03 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.85 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,29 s vs 4,14 s).
e-tron GT quattro passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,14 secondes (simulation calibrée).
e-tron GT quattro : 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. Model 3 Performance : 456 hp, ratio 4,03 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro : 245 km/h. Model 3 Performance : 261 km/h.