Over 0–100 km/h, X1 sDrive20d U11 wins (8,38 s vs 9,16 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X1 sDrive20d U11 | Q3 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,38 s−0,78 s | 9,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,20 s−0,73 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,75 s−1,10 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+1 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X1 sDrive20d U11 | Q3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,09 s | 3,65 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,77 s | 6,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,38 s | 9,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,82 s | 13,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,77 s | 25,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 52,85 s | 54,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,20 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,75 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Seven-speed Steptronic transmission with double clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 560 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d hits 100 km/h in 8.38 s versus 9.16 s for the Q3 SUV. At this point, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d leads by 0.78 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d is doing 113 km/h against 111 km/h for the Q3 SUV. The gap is 0.51 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d crosses the line in 16.20 s versus 16.93 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 155 km/h versus 151 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d finishes in 29.75 s versus 30.84 s, with a 1.09 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (210 vs 209 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X1 sDrive20d and the Q3 SUV are governed to 210 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.88 kg/hp vs 10.40 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.01 seconds. The 0.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X1 sDrive20d U11 wins (8,38 s vs 9,16 s).
X1 sDrive20d U11 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,38 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X1 sDrive20d U11: 163 hp, ratio 9,88 kg/hp. Q3 SUV: 150 hp, ratio 10,40 kg/hp.
X1 sDrive20d U11: 210 km/h. Q3 SUV: 209 km/h.