Among the 18 C-SUV 2022–2026, the X1 sDrive20d ranks 1st of 18 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive20d), 4th of 15 in Tank range (882 km, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback), 9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (8.5 s, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback).
U11 · GENERATION 2024 → · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE
X1 sDrive20d
163 hp, 8,5 s 0-100 : among the 18 C-SUV 2022–2026, the X1 sDrive20d ranks 1st of 18 in Combined consumption, 4th of 15 in Tank range, 9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
163hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.5s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
5.1L
/100 km
Tank
45L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X1 sDrive20d
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 163 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.1 L/100km |
| Tank | 45 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,5 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,692 mm |
| Width | 1,845 mm |
| Height | 1,642 mm |
| Boot | 500 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,610 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 133 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 18 C-SUV, the X1 sDrive20d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 18 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 4th of 15 in Tank range (882 km).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Tank range, the Audi Q3 Sportback (1st with 948 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi Q3 Sportback (1st with 5.7 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (1st of 18 in Combined consumption)
The X1 sDrive20d consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 sDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 882 km (4th of 15 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 sDrive20d covers 882 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 948 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X1 sDrive20d stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 18 C-SUV marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption1e / 18
5.1 L/100
Min 9 L/100 · Audi Q3 SUVMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X1 sDrive20d
Tank range4e / 15
882 km
Min 667 km · Audi Q3 SUVMax 948 km · Audi Q3 Sportback
0–100 km/h9e / 18
8,5 s
Min 10,7 s · Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 FWDMax 5,7 s · Audi Q3 Sportback
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback150 hp · 0-100 9.2 s
3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8131 hp · 0-100 10.8 s
Q3 Sportback150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Q3 SUV150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the X1 sDrive20d
Frequently asked questions
BMW X1 sDrive20d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
882 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 4th of 15 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.