U11 · GENERATION 2024 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X1 sDrive20d

163 hp, 8,5 s 0-100 : among the 20 C-SUV 2022–2026, the X1 sDrive20d ranks 2nd of 20 in Combined consumption, 6th of 18 in Tank range, 10th of 20 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,31615,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

163hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

8.5s

VMax 210 km/h

Cons.

5.1L

/100 km

Tank

45L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 sDrive20d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm\u00b3
Power163 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxDual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic
TransmissionX1 sDrive20d

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,1 L/100km
Tank45 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h8,5 s
VMax210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,500 mm
Wheelbase2,692 mm
Width1,845 mm
Height1,642 mm
Boot500 L
Kerb weight1,610 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP133 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 20 C-SUV, the X1 sDrive20d ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 20 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 6th of 18 in Tank range (882 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 (1st with 1038 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 20 in Combined consumption)

The X1 sDrive20d consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 882 km (6th of 18 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X1 sDrive20d covers 882 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1038 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 sDrive20d stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 20 C-SUV marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption

2eout of 20

5.1 L/100
Min9 L/100 · Audi Q3 SUV
Max4.8 L/100 · Kia Niro HEV FWD

Tank range

6eout of 18

882 km
Min667 km · Audi Q3 SUV
Max1 038 km · Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

0–100 km/h

10eout of 20

8,5 s
Min11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Max5,7 s · Audi Q3 Sportback

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 sDrive20d

Take the next step

Find a X1 sDrive20d or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 sDrive20d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X1 sDrive20d rank in its segment?#

Among the 20 C-SUV 2022–2026, the X1 sDrive20d ranks 2nd of 20 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 6th of 18 in Tank range (882 km, behind the Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200), 10th of 20 in 0–100 km/h (8.5 s, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback).

What is the range of the X1 sDrive20d?#

882 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 6th of 18 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the X1 sDrive20d cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Kia Niro HEV FWD instead?#

The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 sDrive20d vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.