Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 8,62 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Atto 3 Extended Range | Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s−1,21 s | 8,62 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s−0,91 s | 16,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s−1,11 s | 30,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,57 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Atto 3 Extended Range | Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,96 s | 2,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,27 s | 3,76 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,43 s | 6,28 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,03 s | 11,71 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,03 s | 22,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s | 16,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s | 30,31 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Atto 3 Extended Range hits 100 km/h in 7.41 s versus 8.62 s for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW. At this point, the Atto 3 Extended Range leads by 1.21 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range is doing 121 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW. The gap is 0.66 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Atto 3 Extended Range crosses the line in 15.57 s versus 16.48 s. The 0.91 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range finishes in 29.19 s versus 30.31 s, with a 1.11 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 160 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Atto 3 Extended Range and the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW are governed to 160 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.58 kg/hp vs 10.57 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.70 seconds. The 1.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 8,62 s).
Atto 3 Extended Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,41 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Atto 3 Extended Range : 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp. Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW : 201 hp, ratio 10,57 kg/hp.
Atto 3 Extended Range : 160 km/h. Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW : 160 km/h.