Sur 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV gagne (5,00 s vs 5,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50d F16 | Q5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 5,00 s+0,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,38 s+0,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,55 s+0,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,73 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,91 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50d F16 | Q5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,19 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,57 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 5,00 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,14 s | 6,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,41 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,42 s | 20,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Q5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.00 s versus 5.29 s for the Bmw X6 M50d. The instant torque of 500 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Q5 SUV leads by 0.29 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q5 SUV is doing 136 km/h against 135 km/h for the Bmw X6 M50d. The gap is 0.23 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q5 SUV crosses the line in 13.38 s versus 13.62 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Q5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 187 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q5 SUV finishes in 24.54 s versus 24.91 s, with a 0.37 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X6 M50d and the Q5 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.26 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV gagne (5,00 s vs 5,29 s).
X6 M50d F16 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X6 M50d F16 : 381 hp, ratio 5,73 kg/hp. Q5 SUV : 367 hp, ratio 5,91 kg/hp.
X6 M50d F16 : 250 km/h. Q5 SUV : 250 km/h.