Sur 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV gagne (5,00 s vs 5,06 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q5 SUV | Macan GTS 95B.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,00 s−0,06 s | 5,06 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s | 13,38 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 24,40 s+0,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 256 km/h−6 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,91 kg/hp | 5,26 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q5 SUV | Macan GTS 95B.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,19 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,00 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,57 s | 3,76 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,00 s | 5,06 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,88 s | 6,87 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,14 s | 11,56 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,28 s | 19,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s | 13,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 24,40 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 256 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Q5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.00 s versus 5.06 s for the Macan GTS. The instant torque of 500 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Q5 SUV is doing 136 km/h against 138 km/h for the Macan GTS. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan GTS crosses the line in 13.37 s versus 13.38 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, the Macan GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 188 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan GTS finishes in 24.40 s versus 24.54 s, with a 0.15 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 256 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q5 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Macan GTS at 256 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.94 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV gagne (5,00 s vs 5,06 s).
Q5 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,00 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q5 SUV : 367 hp, ratio 5,91 kg/hp. Macan GTS 95B.1 : 360 hp, ratio 5,26 kg/hp.
Q5 SUV : 250 km/h. Macan GTS 95B.1 : 256 km/h.