Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (5,82 s vs 7,79 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | A5 Sedan | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s−1,97 s | 7,79 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s−1,58 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s−2,57 s | 28,63 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 242 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,05 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,92 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | A5 Sedan |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,83 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,13 s | 5,46 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 7,79 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,00 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,39 s | 19,81 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,59 s | 34,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 28,63 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 242 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.82 s versus 7.79 s for the A5 Sedan. The instant torque of 600 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 1.97 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 129 km/h against 117 km/h for the A5 Sedan. The gap is 1.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 14.16 s versus 15.74 s. The 1.58 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 26.06 s versus 28.62 s, with a 2.57 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 242 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the A5 Sedan’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Q7 SUV and the A5 Sedan are governed to 240 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.41 seconds. The 1.97 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (5,82 s vs 7,79 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,82 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 394 hp, ratio 6,05 kg/hp. A5 Sedan: 204 hp, ratio 8,92 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 235 km/h. A5 Sedan: 242 km/h.