Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 5,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | SQ5 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 4,42 s+1,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 12,76 s+1,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 23,50 s+2,56 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 250 km/h−15 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,05 kg/hp | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | SQ5 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,13 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,00 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,39 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,59 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 235 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 5.82 s for the Q7 SUV. Despite lacking instant torque, 367 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ5 Sportback leads by 1.40 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 Sportback is doing 142 km/h against 129 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.95 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 Sportback crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 14.16 s. The 1.40 s gap represents roughly 60 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 Sportback finishes in 23.50 s versus 26.06 s, with a 2.56 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the SQ5 Sportback at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.29 seconds. The 1.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 5,82 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,82 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 394 hp, ratio 6,05 kg/hp. SQ5 Sportback : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 235 km/h. SQ5 Sportback : 250 km/h.