Over 0–100 km/h, 740Ld xDrive G11 wins (5,24 s vs 5,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | 740Ld xDrive G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 5,24 s+0,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 13,54 s+0,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 24,61 s+1,45 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 250 km/h−15 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,05 kg/hp | 5,98 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | 740Ld xDrive G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,13 s | 3,77 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 5,24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,00 s | 7,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,39 s | 12,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,59 s | 19,91 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 13,54 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 235 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 915 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive hits 100 km/h in 5.24 s versus 5.82 s for the Q7 SUV. Despite lacking instant torque, 320 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive leads by 0.58 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive is doing 136 km/h against 129 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive crosses the line in 13.54 s versus 14.16 s. The 0.62 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive finishes in 24.60 s versus 26.06 s, with a 1.46 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 740Ld xDrive at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.29 seconds. The 0.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 740Ld xDrive G11 wins (5,24 s vs 5,82 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,82 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 394 hp, ratio 6,05 kg/hp. 740Ld xDrive G11: 320 hp, ratio 5,98 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 235 km/h. 740Ld xDrive G11: 250 km/h.