Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30d G01 gagne (5,78 s vs 5,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | X3 xDrive30d G01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 5,78 s+0,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 14,12 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 25,96 s+0,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 240 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,05 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,87 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | X3 xDrive30d G01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 2,23 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,13 s | 4,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,82 s | 5,78 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,00 s | 7,99 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,39 s | 14,32 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,59 s | 25,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 14,12 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,06 s | 25,96 stight gap |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X3 xDrive30d hits 100 km/h in 5.78 s versus 5.82 s for the Q7 SUV. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. The 0.04 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30d is doing 129 km/h against 129 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.05 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X3 xDrive30d crosses the line in 14.11 s versus 14.16 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 178 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30d finishes in 25.96 s versus 26.06 s, with a 0.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Q7 SUV and the Bmw X3 xDrive30d are governed to 240 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.29 seconds. The 0.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30d G01 gagne (5,78 s vs 5,82 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,82 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 394 hp, ratio 6,05 kg/hp. X3 xDrive30d G01 : 265 hp, ratio 6,87 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 235 km/h. X3 xDrive30d G01 : 240 km/h.