Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Duel›Audi RS vs MINI Cooper

Performance comparison

Audi RS e-tron GT vs MINI Cooper S FWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

AudiBEVFaster

RS e-tron GT

671 hp · 830 Nm · 2,395 kg · 2022

VS
MINIPetrol

Cooper S FWD

204 hp · 300 Nm · 1,195 kg · 2024

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

RS e-tron GTCooper S FWD
0–100 km/h3,33 s−3,23 s6,56 s
400 m standing start11,32 s−3,30 s14,62 s
1,000 m standing start20,60 s−5,43 s26,03 s
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h250 km/h
Power-to-weight ratio3,57 kg/hpbetter ratio5,86 kg/hp

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVRS e-tron GT
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
MINIPetrolCooper S FWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.

PalierRS e-tron GTCooper S FWD
0–30 km/h0,95 s1,88 s
0–50 km/h1,59 s3,14 s
0–80 km/h2,55 s4,99 s
0–100 km/h3,33 s6,56 s
0–120 km/h4,32 s8,41 s
0–160 km/h7,15 s13,79 s
0–200 km/h11,16 s22,98 s
400 m standing start11,32 s14,62 s
1,000 m standing start20,60 s26,03 s
Top speed limited250 km/h250 km/h

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

RS e-tron GT

3,57kg/hpratio better by 2,29 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power671 hpPending
Torque830 Nm
Weight2 395 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
MINI

Cooper S FWD

5,86kg/hpcompensated by −1 200 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power204 hpPending
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 195 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox7-speed DCT

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 6.56 s for the Cooper S FWD. The instant torque of 830 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 3.23 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 132 km/h for the Cooper S FWD. The gap is 2.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.31 s versus 14.62 s. The 3.31 s gap represents roughly 142 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.60 s versus 26.02 s, with a 5.43 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The RS e-tron GT features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Cooper S FWD’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the RS e-tron GT never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.51 seconds. The 3.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of RS e-tron GT
Tesla Model S PerformanceXiaomi SU7 Max AWDBMW i7 M70 xDrive
Instead of Cooper S FWD
Bmw 330d xDriveAudi A5 SedanBmw 530d xDrive

Autres duels qui pourraient vous intéresser

AudiVSPorsche

RS e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo

VolkswagenVSMINI

Polo GTI vs Cooper S FWD

AudiVSPorsche

RS e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo

PeugeotVSMINI

208 GTi 30th 208 vs Cooper S FWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 6,56 s).

RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).

RS e-tron GT: 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. Cooper S FWD: 204 hp, ratio 5,86 kg/hp.

RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. Cooper S FWD: 250 km/h.