Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
ARSvsBModelBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS · Model

Audi RS e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S Long Range: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2022 vs 2023 · Methodology
AudiBEV

RS e-tron GT

671 hp · 830 Nm · 2,395 kg · 2022

VS
TeslaBEVFaster

Model S Long Range

670 hp · 908 Nm · 2,069 kg · 2023

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi RS e-tron GT

3.33 s

Gap0.12 sin favour of Model S Long Range
BTesla Model S Long Range

3.21 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS e-tron GTModel S Long RangeGap
0–100 km/h3.33 s3.21 s0.12 s · Model S Long Range
400 m standing start11.32 s11.02 s0.30 s · Model S Long Range
1,000 m standing start20.60 s20.06 s0.54 s · Model S Long Range
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h250 km/hSame
Power-to-weight ratio3.57 kg/hp3.09 kg/hpbetter ratio · Model S Long Range

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVRS e-tron GT
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel S Long Range
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageRS e-tron GTModel S Long Range
0–30 km/h0.95 s0.94 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h1.59 s1.56 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h2.55 s2.51 s · tight gap
0–100 km/h3.33 s3.21 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h4.32 s4.11 s
0–160 km/h7.15 s6.58 s
0–200 km/h11.16 s10.02 s
400 m standing start11.32 s11.02 s
1,000 m standing start20.60 s20.06 s
Top speed limited250 km/h250 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

RS e-tron GT

3,57kg/hpcompensated by −326 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power671 hpPending
Torque830 Nm
Weight2 395 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Tesla

Model S Long Range

3,09kg/hpratio better by 0,48 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power670 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque908 Nm
Weight2 069 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model S Long Range hits 100 km/h in 3.22 s versus 3.33 s for the RS e-tron GT. The 0.12 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model S Long Range is doing 169 km/h against 163 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Long Range crosses the line in 11.02 s versus 11.31 s. The 0.30 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model S Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 237 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Long Range finishes in 20.05 s versus 20.60 s, with a 0.55 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS e-tron GT and the Model S Long Range are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.57 kg/hp vs 3.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.92 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of RS e-tron GT
Audi S e-tron GT
Instead of Model S Long Range
Tesla Model S P85DTesla Model S Long RangeTesla Model S Long Range

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

RS e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo

AudiVSTesla

S e-tron GT vs Model S Long Range

AudiVSPorsche

RS e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo

PorscheVSTesla

Taycan Turbo vs Model S Long Range

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range wins (3,21 s vs 3,33 s).

RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).

RS e-tron GT: 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. Model S Long Range: 670 hp, ratio 3,09 kg/hp.

RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. Model S Long Range: 250 km/h.