Over 0–100 km/h, RS Q8 SUV wins (3,87 s vs 4,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS Q8 SUV | SQ5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,87 s−0,55 s | 4,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,88 s−0,88 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,56 s−1,94 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,86 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS Q8 SUV | SQ5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,08 s | 1,06 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,81 s | 1,78 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,90 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,87 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,01 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,12 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,77 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,88 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,56 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 315 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the RS Q8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 3.87 s versus 4.42 s for the SQ5 SUV. At this point, the RS Q8 SUV leads by 0.55 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS Q8 SUV is doing 156 km/h against 142 km/h for the SQ5 SUV. The gap is 0.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS Q8 SUV crosses the line in 11.88 s versus 12.76 s. The 0.88 s gap represents roughly 42 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS Q8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 217 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS Q8 SUV finishes in 21.56 s versus 23.50 s, with a 1.94 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS Q8 SUV and the SQ5 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.86 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.96 seconds. The 0.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS Q8 SUV wins (3,87 s vs 4,42 s).
RS Q8 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,87 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS Q8 SUV: 600 hp, ratio 3,86 kg/hp. SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
RS Q8 SUV: 250 km/h. SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h.