Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range AWD wins (4,26 s vs 4,53 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S5 Avant | Model 3 Long Range AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,53 s | 4,26 s+0,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,84 s | 12,62 s+0,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,49 s | 23,18 s+0,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+17 km/h | 233 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,35 kg/hp | 5,19 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S5 Avant | Model 3 Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 1,88 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,23 s | 3,13 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,53 s | 4,26 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,15 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,55 s | 10,08 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,29 s | 16,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,84 s | 12,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,49 s | 23,18 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 965 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 358 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 637 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 857 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Long Range AWD hits 100 km/h in 4.26 s versus 4.53 s for the S5 Avant. The instant torque of 637 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.27 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD is doing 145 km/h against 142 km/h for the S5 Avant. The gap is 0.15 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Long Range AWD crosses the line in 12.62 s versus 12.83 s. The 0.21 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 199 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD finishes in 23.17 s versus 23.49 s, with a 0.31 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), the S5 Avant never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S5 Avant is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Model 3 Long Range AWD at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.09 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range AWD wins (4,26 s vs 4,53 s).
S5 Avant goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,53 seconds (calibrated simulation).
S5 Avant: 367 hp, ratio 5,35 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 358 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp.
S5 Avant: 250 km/h. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 233 km/h.