Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AS6vsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsS6 · Model 3

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2026 vs 2024 · Methodology
AudiBEVFaster

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 hp · 855 Nm · 2,325 kg · 2026

VS
TeslaBEV

Model 3 Long Range AWD

358 hp · 637 Nm · 1,857 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi S6 Sportback e-tron

4.08 s

Gap0.18 sin favour of S6 Sportback e-tron
BTesla Model 3 Long Range AWD

4.26 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureS6 Sportback e-tronModel 3 Long Range AWDGap
0–100 km/h4.08 s4.26 s0.18 s · S6 Sportback e-tron
400 m standing start12.52 s12.62 s0.10 s · S6 Sportback e-tron
1,000 m standing start23.58 s23.18 s0.40 s · Model 3 Long Range AWD
Top speed (electronically limited)233 km/h233 km/hSame
Power-to-weight ratio4.28 kg/hp5.19 kg/hpbetter ratio · S6 Sportback e-tron

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVS6 Sportback e-tron
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel 3 Long Range AWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageS6 Sportback e-tronModel 3 Long Range AWD
0–30 km/h1.11 s · tight gap1.13 s
0–50 km/h1.86 s · tight gap1.88 s
0–80 km/h3.03 s · tight gap3.13 s
0–100 km/h4.08 s4.26 s
0–120 km/h5.44 s5.71 s
0–160 km/h10.00 s · tight gap10.08 s
0–200 km/h19.13 s16.70 s
400 m standing start12.52 s · tight gap12.62 s
1,000 m standing start23.58 s23.18 s
Top speed233 km/h233 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

S6 Sportback e-tron

4,28kg/hpratio better by 0,91 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power543 hpPending
Torque855 Nm
Weight2 325 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Tesla

Model 3 Long Range AWD

5,19kg/hpcompensated by −468 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power358 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque637 Nm
Weight1 857 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the S6 Sportback e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.08 s versus 4.26 s for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. At this point, the S6 Sportback e-tron leads by 0.18 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the S6 Sportback e-tron is doing 146 km/h against 145 km/h for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the S6 Sportback e-tron crosses the line in 12.52 s versus 12.62 s. The 0.10 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 233 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 233 km/h.

At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD finishes in 23.17 s versus 23.58 s. The 0.40 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 240 km/h, the Model 3 Long Range AWD at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.28 kg/hp vs 5.19 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.60 seconds. The 0.18 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of S6 Sportback e-tron
BMW i4 M50 xDrive

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

S6 Sportback e-tron vs Taycan 4S

VolvoVSTesla

V60 T8 AWD Recharge vs Model 3 Long Range AWD

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan 4S Cross Turismo vs S6 Sportback e-tron

TeslaVSBMW

Model 3 Long Range AWD vs i4 eDrive35

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, S6 Sportback e-tron wins (4,08 s vs 4,26 s).

S6 Sportback e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,08 seconds (calibrated simulation).

S6 Sportback e-tron: 543 hp, ratio 4,28 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 358 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp.

S6 Sportback e-tron: 233 km/h. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 233 km/h.