Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
ASQ5PetrolvsBScenicBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsSQ5 · Scenic

Audi SQ5 Sportback vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

family SUV · 2026 vs 2024 · Methodology
AudiPetrolFaster

SQ5 Sportback

367 hp · 550 Nm · 2,040 kg · 2026

VS
RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

170 hp · 300 Nm · 1,777 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi SQ5 Sportback

4.42 s

Gap3.76 sin favour of SQ5 Sportback
BRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

8.18 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureSQ5 SportbackScenic E-Tech Electric 170Gap
0–100 km/h4.42 s8.18 s3.76 s · SQ5 Sportback
400 m standing start12.76 s16.12 s3.36 s · SQ5 Sportback
1,000 m standing start23.50 s29.80 s6.30 s · SQ5 Sportback
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h211 km/h39 km/h · SQ5 Sportback
Power-to-weight ratio5.56 kg/hp10.45 kg/hpbetter ratio · SQ5 Sportback

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiPetrolSQ5 Sportback
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultBEVScenic E-Tech Electric 170
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageSQ5 SportbackScenic E-Tech Electric 170
0–30 km/h1.06 s1.90 s
0–50 km/h1.78 s3.17 s
0–80 km/h3.15 s5.71 s
0–100 km/h4.42 s8.18 s
0–120 km/h6.02 s11.49 s
0–160 km/h10.50 s23.49 s
0–200 km/h17.55 s58.58 s
400 m standing start12.76 s16.12 s
1,000 m standing start23.50 s29.80 s
Top speed limited250 km/h211 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

SQ5 Sportback

5,56kg/hpratio better by 4,89 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power367 hpPending
Torque550 Nm
Weight2 040 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox7-speed S tronic
Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

10,45kg/hpcompensated by −263 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power170 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 777 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. Despite lacking instant torque, 367 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ5 Sportback leads by 3.76 s and sits roughly 27 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the SQ5 Sportback is doing 142 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 2.24 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 Sportback crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 16.11 s. The 3.36 s gap represents roughly 124 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the SQ5 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 Sportback finishes in 23.50 s versus 29.80 s, with a 6.30 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The SQ5 Sportback features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the SQ5 Sportback never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 3.76 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

SQ5 Sportback vs X3 M40i

AudiVSRenault

Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

AudiVSBMW

SQ5 Sportback vs X3 M40i

AudiVSRenault

Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback wins (4,42 s vs 8,18 s).

SQ5 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).

SQ5 Sportback: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.

SQ5 Sportback: 250 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 211 km/h.