Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,98 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ6 SUV e-tron | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 5.98 s | 1.62 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 14.27 s | 1.57 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 26.41 s | 3.12 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 230 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.76 kg/hp | 6.23 kg/hp | better ratio · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ6 SUV e-tron | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.16 s | 1.31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 2.11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.21 s | 4.09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 5.98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.84 s | 8.25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.17 s | 15.16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.87 s | 28.87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 14.27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 26.41 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 230 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 5.98 s for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 1.62 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 127 km/h for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 0.95 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 14.27 s. The 1.57 s gap represents roughly 66 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 26.41 s, with a 3.12 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the SQ6 SUV e-tron never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 1.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,98 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.