Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV gagne (4,04 s vs 4,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | SQ7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 4,04 s+0,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,11 s+0,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 21,94 s+0,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+35 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,34 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | SQ7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 3,07 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 4,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 8,52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 13,41 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 21,94 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 285 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.04 s versus 4.35 s for the F-PACE SVR. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 0.31 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 154 km/h for the F-PACE SVR. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.30 s. The 0.19 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The SQ7 SUV maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h while the F-PACE SVR keeps accelerating towards 285 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.16 s.
At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.94 s versus 22.05 s, with just 0.11 s to spare. The F-PACE SVR fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-PACE SVR is capped at 285 km/h, the SQ7 SUV at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.68 kg/hp vs 4.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.20 seconds. The 0.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV gagne (4,04 s vs 4,35 s).
F-PACE SVR passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-PACE SVR : 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. SQ7 SUV : 507 hp, ratio 4,34 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR : 285 km/h. SQ7 SUV : 250 km/h.