Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper C FWD gagne (7,70 s vs 8,62 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cooper C FWD | 118d xDrive F20LCI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,70 s−0,92 s | 8,62 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,68 s−0,61 s | 16,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,07 s−1,80 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+20 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,47 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,80 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cooper C FWD | 118d xDrive F20LCI |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,08 s | 1,80 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,48 s | 3,05 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,68 s | 5,89 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,70 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,14 s | 12,06 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,52 s | 23,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 32,20 s | 52,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,68 s | 16,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,07 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 230 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 165 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Cooper C FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.70 s versus 8.62 s for the Bmw 118d xDrive. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 118d xDrive is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Cooper C FWD is doing 122 km/h against 112 km/h for the Bmw 118d xDrive. The gap is 0.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper C FWD crosses the line in 15.67 s versus 16.28 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cooper C FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 170 km/h versus 155 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cooper C FWD finishes in 28.06 s versus 29.87 s, with a 1.80 s lead.
The Bmw 118d xDrive features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Cooper C FWD’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw 118d xDrive never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.47 kg/hp vs 9.80 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.20 seconds. The 0.92 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper C FWD gagne (7,70 s vs 8,62 s).
Cooper C FWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,70 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cooper C FWD : 156 hp, ratio 7,47 kg/hp. 118d xDrive F20LCI : 150 hp, ratio 9,80 kg/hp.
Cooper C FWD : 230 km/h. 118d xDrive F20LCI : 210 km/h.