Cooper C FWD
156 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 25 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper C FWD ranks 20th of 23 in Combined consumption, 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications MINI Cooper C FWD
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,728 mm |
| Height | 1,432 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,165 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 25 city cars, the Cooper C FWD ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
city car among the best in segment: 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition (1st with 5.3 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (20th of 23 in Combined consumption)
The Cooper C FWD consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Cooper C FWD stands against city cars
Comparison across 25 city cars marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption
20eout of 23
0–100 km/h
4eout of 25
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
156 hp · 0-100 8.9 s
Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
160 hp · 0-100 8.6 s
A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW
150 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
A1 Sportback 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW
150 hp · 0-100 8.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full MINI Cooper J01 range
Generation J01 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the J01
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cooper C FWD
Take the next step
Find a Cooper C FWD or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
MINI Cooper C FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 25 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper C FWD ranks 20th of 23 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cooper C FWD vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.