Among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper C FWD ranks 16th of 20 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
J01 · GENERATION 2024 → · CITY CAR
MINIICE
Cooper C FWD
156 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper C FWD ranks 16th of 20 in Combined consumption, 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications MINI Cooper C FWD
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,728 mm |
| Height | 1,432 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,165 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 city cars, the Cooper C FWD ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
city car among the best in segment: 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition (1st with 5.3 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (16th of 20 in Combined consumption)
The Cooper C FWD consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cooper C FWD stands against city cars
Comparison across 22 city cars marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption16e / 20
6 L/100
Min 6.6 L/100 · MINI Cooper S FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
0–100 km/h4e / 22
7,7 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,3 s · Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8156 hp · 0-100 8.9 s
A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW150 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
A1 Sportback 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW150 hp · 0-100 8.1 s
Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140140 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full MINI Cooper J01 range
Generation J01 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the J01
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cooper C FWD
Frequently asked questions
MINI Cooper C FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cooper C FWD vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.