Sur 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 gagne (7,46 s vs 7,79 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320e G20 | A4 40 TDI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,46 s−0,33 s | 7,79 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,44 s−0,33 s | 15,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,77 s | 28,09 s+0,68 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 242 km/h−27 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,65 kg/hp | 8,29 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320e G20 | A4 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 2,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,37 s | 3,61 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,96 s | 5,84 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,46 s | 7,79 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,74 s | 10,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,97 s | 17,57 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 46,63 s | 30,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,44 s | 15,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,77 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 242 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 320e hits 100 km/h in 7.46 s versus 7.79 s for the A4 40 TDI. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw 320e leads by 0.33 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320e is doing 115 km/h against 122 km/h for the A4 40 TDI. The gap is 0.68 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320e crosses the line in 15.43 s versus 15.77 s. The 0.33 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw 320e maxes out at 215 km/h while the A4 40 TDI keeps accelerating towards 242 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.01 s.
Around 594 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the A4 40 TDI overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 27 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the A4 40 TDI finishes in 28.08 s versus 28.77 s. The 0.68 s delta in favour of the A4 40 TDI shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Electronically capped at 220 km/h, the Bmw 320e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 0.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 gagne (7,46 s vs 7,79 s).
320e G20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,46 secondes (simulation calibrée).
320e G20 : 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp. A4 40 TDI : 190 hp, ratio 8,29 kg/hp.
320e G20 : 215 km/h. A4 40 TDI : 242 km/h.