Over 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 wins (7,05 s vs 8,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320i G20 | 600e 156 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,05 s−1,87 s | 8,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,12 s−1,61 s | 16,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,81 s−3,42 s | 31,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 234 km/h+84 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,06 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320i G20 | 600e 156 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 2,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,44 s | 3,98 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,84 s | 6,56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,05 s | 8,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,85 s | 12,08 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,13 s | - |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,99 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,12 s | 16,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,81 s | 31,23 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 460 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reducer (BEV) |
Off the line, the Bmw 320i hits 100 km/h in 7.05 s versus 8.92 s for the 600e 156. Despite lacking instant torque, 184 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw 320i leads by 1.87 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320i is doing 119 km/h against 115 km/h for the 600e 156. The gap is 1.37 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320i crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 16.73 s. The 1.62 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320i finishes in 27.81 s versus 31.23 s, with a 3.42 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 320i is capped at 235 km/h, the 600e 156 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.15 seconds. The 1.87 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 wins (7,05 s vs 8,92 s).
320i G20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
320i G20: 184 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp. 600e 156: 156 hp, ratio 10,06 kg/hp.
320i G20: 234 km/h. 600e 156: 150 km/h.