Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 wins (8,07 s vs 9,59 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 520e G30 | 508 THP 160 EAT6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,07 s−1,52 s | 9,59 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,87 s−1,31 s | 17,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,49 s−0,63 s | 30,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 213 km/h | 226 km/h−13 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,31 kg/hp | 8,68 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 520e G30 | 508 THP 160 EAT6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,44 s | 2,77 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,58 s | 4,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,37 s | 7,34 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,07 s | 9,59 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,61 s | 12,45 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,82 s | 21,10 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 52,29 s | 39,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,87 s | 17,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,49 s | 30,12 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic EAT6 |
Off the line, the 520e hits 100 km/h in 8.07 s versus 9.59 s for the 508 THP 160 EAT6. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the 520e leads by 1.52 s and sits roughly 40 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 520e is doing 113 km/h against 115 km/h for the 508 THP 160 EAT6. The gap is 1.51 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 520e crosses the line in 15.86 s versus 17.18 s. The 1.31 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The 520e maxes out at 213 km/h while the 508 THP 160 EAT6 keeps accelerating towards 226 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 1.08 s from 1.31 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the 520e finishes in 29.49 s versus 30.11 s, with just 0.62 s to spare. The 508 THP 160 EAT6 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 218 km/h, the 520e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.22 seconds. The 1.52 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 wins (8,07 s vs 9,59 s).
520e G30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,07 seconds (calibrated simulation).
520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,31 kg/hp. 508 THP 160 EAT6: 163 hp, ratio 8,68 kg/hp.
520e G30: 213 km/h. 508 THP 160 EAT6: 226 km/h.