Over 0–100 km/h, 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 wins (5,32 s vs 7,41 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 | Atto 3 Extended Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,32 s−2,09 s | 7,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,54 s−2,03 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,73 s−4,47 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+90 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,13 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,96 s | 3,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,63 s | 5,43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,32 s | 7,41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,19 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,49 s | 19,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,49 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,54 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,73 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 5.32 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. At this point, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance leads by 2.09 s and sits roughly 27 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance is doing 134 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 1.48 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance crosses the line in 13.54 s versus 15.57 s. The 2.03 s gap represents roughly 81 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance finishes in 24.72 s versus 29.19 s, with a 4.47 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.13 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 2.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 wins (5,32 s vs 7,41 s).
740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,32 seconds (calibrated simulation).
740Le xDrive iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 6,13 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
740Le xDrive iPerformance G11: 250 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h.