Over 0–100 km/h, 840i G15 wins (5,12 s vs 6,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 840i G15 | EQS 450 V297 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,12 s−1,18 s | 6,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,34 s−1,22 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,04 s−2,34 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+40 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,20 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 840i G15 | EQS 450 V297 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,42 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 2,71 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,81 s | 4,57 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,12 s | 6,30 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,75 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,20 s | 15,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,00 s | 25,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,34 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,04 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 840i hits 100 km/h in 5.12 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. Despite lacking instant torque, 333 hp of power compensates. At this point, the 840i leads by 1.18 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 840i is doing 140 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 0.76 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 840i crosses the line in 13.33 s versus 14.56 s. The 1.23 s gap represents roughly 53 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 840i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 840i finishes in 24.04 s versus 26.37 s, with a 2.34 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 840i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the EQS 450 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 1.18 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 840i G15 wins (5,12 s vs 6,30 s).
840i G15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
840i G15: 333 hp, ratio 5,20 kg/hp. EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp.
840i G15: 250 km/h. EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h.