Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 wins (6,12 s vs 6,77 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | i5 eDrive40 G60 | Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.12 s | 6.77 s | 0.65 s · i5 eDrive40 G60 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.30 s | 14.99 s | 0.69 s · i5 eDrive40 G60 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 27.44 s | 1.57 s · i5 eDrive40 G60 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 180 km/h | 13 km/h · i5 eDrive40 G60 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.81 kg/hp | 7.50 kg/hp | better ratio · i5 eDrive40 G60 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | i5 eDrive40 G60 | Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.79 s · tight gap | 1.79 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.98 s · tight gap | 2.99 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.78 s | 4.96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.12 s | 6.77 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.84 s | 9.11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.27 s | 16.30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.30 s | 14.99 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 27.44 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 545 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 145 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the i5 eDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.12 s versus 6.77 s for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. At this point, the i5 eDrive40 leads by 0.65 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the i5 eDrive40 is doing 135 km/h against 125 km/h for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. The gap is 0.33 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the i5 eDrive40 crosses the line in 14.29 s versus 14.98 s. The 0.69 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the i5 eDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 27.43 s, with a 1.57 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (193 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 7.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.55 seconds. The 0.65 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 wins (6,12 s vs 6,77 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW: 286 hp, ratio 7,50 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW: 180 km/h.