Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,60 s vs 6,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | 530d G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 5,60 s+0,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 13,90 s+0,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 25,29 s+0,58 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 250 km/h−57 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hp | 6,15 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | 530d G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 2,25 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 3,98 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 5,60 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 7,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 13,26 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 21,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 13,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 25,29 s |
| Top speed limited | 193 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 760 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 530d hits 100 km/h in 5.60 s versus 6.12 s for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. Despite lacking instant torque, 286 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw 530d leads by 0.52 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 530d is doing 132 km/h against 135 km/h for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. The gap is 0.48 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 530d crosses the line in 13.90 s versus 14.29 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 530d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530d finishes in 25.29 s versus 25.87 s, with a 0.58 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the Bmw 530d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.92 seconds. The 0.52 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,60 s vs 6,12 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. 530d G30 : 286 hp, ratio 6,15 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 193 km/h. 530d G30 : 250 km/h.