Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ2 gagne (4,94 s vs 6,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX xDrive40 | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 4,94 s+1,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s | 13,47 s+0,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,37 s | 24,55 s+1,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 257 km/h−57 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,48 kg/hp | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX xDrive40 | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,42 s | 1,24 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,37 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,25 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,34 s | 7,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,21 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,44 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,37 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 630 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 440 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 6.04 s for the iX xDrive40. Despite lacking instant torque, 300 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 1.10 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 127 km/h for the iX xDrive40. The gap is 0.58 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 14.36 s. The 0.89 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 26.37 s, with a 1.82 s lead.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the iX xDrive40 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.74 seconds. The 1.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ2 gagne (4,94 s vs 6,04 s).
iX xDrive40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,04 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX xDrive40 : 326 hp, ratio 7,48 kg/hp. SQ2 : 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
iX xDrive40 : 200 km/h. SQ2 : 257 km/h.