Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AiXBEVvsB520ePHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsiX · 520e

BMW iX xDrive40 vs BMW 520e G30: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2021 vs 2021 · Methodology
BMWBEVFaster

iX xDrive40

326 hp · 630 Nm · 2,440 kg · 2021

VS
BMWPHEV

520e G30

204 hp · 350 Nm · 1,900 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW iX xDrive40

6.04 s

Gap2.03 sin favour of iX xDrive40
BBMW 520e G30

8.07 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureiX xDrive40520e G30Gap
0–100 km/h6.04 s8.07 s2.03 s · iX xDrive40
400 m standing start14.37 s15.87 s1.50 s · iX xDrive40
1,000 m standing start26.37 s29.49 s3.12 s · iX xDrive40
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h213 km/h13 km/h · 520e G30
Power-to-weight ratio7.48 kg/hp9.31 kg/hpbetter ratio · iX xDrive40

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEViX xDrive40
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPHEV520e G30
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageiX xDrive40520e G30
0–30 km/h1.42 s · tight gap1.44 s
0–50 km/h2.37 s2.58 s
0–80 km/h4.25 s5.37 s
0–100 km/h6.04 s8.07 s
0–120 km/h8.34 s11.61 s
0–160 km/h15.21 s22.82 s
0–200 km/h26.44 s52.29 s
400 m standing start14.37 s15.87 s
1,000 m standing start26.37 s29.49 s
Top speed200 km/h213 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

iX xDrive40

7,48kg/hpratio better by 1,83 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power326 hpPending
Torque630 Nm
Weight2 440 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed reduction gear
BMW

520e G30

9,31kg/hpcompensated by −540 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power204 hp4 cyl
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 900 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxEight-speed Steptronic transmission

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the iX xDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 8.07 s for the 520e. At this point, the iX xDrive40 leads by 2.03 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the iX xDrive40 is doing 127 km/h against 113 km/h for the 520e. The gap is 0.85 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the iX xDrive40 crosses the line in 14.36 s versus 15.86 s. The 1.50 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the iX xDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive40 finishes in 26.37 s versus 29.49 s, with a 3.12 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 213 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The iX xDrive40 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 520e’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive40 is capped at 200 km/h, the 520e at 218 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.48 kg/hp vs 9.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.80 seconds. The 2.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 100D vs iX xDrive40

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 520e

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 90D vs iX xDrive40

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 520e

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive40 wins (6,04 s vs 8,07 s).

iX xDrive40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).

iX xDrive40: 326 hp, ratio 7,48 kg/hp. 520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,31 kg/hp.

iX xDrive40: 200 km/h. 520e G30: 213 km/h.