Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive40 and X5 xDrive30d G05 are neck and neck (6,04 s vs 6,05 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX xDrive40 | X5 xDrive30d G05 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s−0,01 s | 6,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s | 14,34 s+0,03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,37 s−0,20 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 235 km/h−35 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,48 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,66 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX xDrive40 | X5 xDrive30d G05 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,42 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,37 s | 2,05 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,25 s | 4,12 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 6,05 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,34 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,21 s | 15,72 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,44 s | 29,06 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s | 14,34 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,37 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 630 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 440 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 190 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the iX xDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 6.05 s for the X5 xDrive30d. The instant torque of 630 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the X5 xDrive30d is doing 125 km/h against 127 km/h for the iX xDrive40. The gap is 0.12 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the X5 xDrive30d crosses the line in 14.33 s versus 14.36 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The iX xDrive40 maxes out at 200 km/h while the X5 xDrive30d keeps accelerating towards 235 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 500 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the iX xDrive40 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 35 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive40 finishes in 26.37 s versus 26.57 s. The 0.20 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive40 is capped at 200 km/h, the X5 xDrive30d at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.01 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive40 and X5 xDrive30d G05 are neck and neck (6,04 s vs 6,05 s, no significant gap).
iX xDrive40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX xDrive40: 326 hp, ratio 7,48 kg/hp. X5 xDrive30d G05: 286 hp, ratio 7,66 kg/hp.
iX xDrive40: 200 km/h. X5 xDrive30d G05: 235 km/h.