Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Duel›BMW iX vs Tesla Model 3

Performance comparison

BMW iX xDrive40 vs Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

BMWBEV

iX xDrive40

326 hp · 630 Nm · 2,440 kg · 2021

VS
TeslaBEVFaster

Model 3 Standard Range Plus

227 hp · 449 Nm · 1,655 kg · 2019

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

iX xDrive40Model 3 Standard Range Plus
0–100 km/h6,04 s5,81 s+0,23 s
400 m standing start14,37 s14,27 s+0,10 s
1,000 m standing start26,37 s−0,24 s26,61 s
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h224 km/h−24 km/h
Power-to-weight ratio7,48 kg/hp7,29 kg/hpbetter ratio

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEViX xDrive40
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel 3 Standard Range Plus
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.

PalieriX xDrive40Model 3 Standard Range Plus
0–30 km/h1,42 s1,44 stight gap
0–50 km/h2,37 s2,40 stight gap
0–80 km/h4,25 s4,14 stight gap
0–100 km/h6,04 s5,81 s
0–120 km/h8,34 s8,01 s
0–160 km/h15,21 s15,57 s
0–200 km/h26,44 s32,27 s
400 m standing start14,37 s14,27 stight gap
1,000 m standing start26,37 s26,61 s
Top speed200 km/h224 km/h

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

iX xDrive40

7,48kg/hpcompensated by −785 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power326 hpPending
Torque630 Nm
Weight2 440 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed reduction gear
Tesla

Model 3 Standard Range Plus

7,29kg/hpratio better by 0,19 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power227 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque449 Nm
Weight1 655 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus hits 100 km/h in 5.81 s versus 6.04 s for the iX xDrive40. The 0.23 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus is doing 129 km/h against 127 km/h for the iX xDrive40. The gap is 0.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus crosses the line in 14.26 s versus 14.36 s. The 0.10 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The iX xDrive40 maxes out at 200 km/h while the Model 3 Standard Range Plus keeps accelerating towards 224 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.03 s.

Around 666 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the iX xDrive40 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 24 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive40 finishes in 26.37 s versus 26.61 s. The 0.24 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The iX xDrive40 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Model 3 Standard Range Plus’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive40 is capped at 200 km/h, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.48 kg/hp vs 7.29 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.74 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of iX xDrive40
Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWDJaguar I-PACE EV400Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD
Instead of Model 3 Standard Range Plus
Bmw i4 eDrive35Audi A6 Sportback e-tronXpeng P7i

Autres duels qui pourraient vous intéresser

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 100D vs iX xDrive40

BmwVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 Standard Range Plus

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 90D vs iX xDrive40

VolvoVSTesla

V60 T8 AWD Recharge vs Model 3 Standard Range Plus

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Standard Range Plus wins (5,81 s vs 6,04 s).

iX xDrive40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).

iX xDrive40: 326 hp, ratio 7,48 kg/hp. Model 3 Standard Range Plus: 227 hp, ratio 7,29 kg/hp.

iX xDrive40: 200 km/h. Model 3 Standard Range Plus: 224 km/h.