Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
Ai4vsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specsi4 · Model 3

BMW i4 eDrive35 G26 vs Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

saloon · 2024 vs 2019 · Methodology
BMWBEV

i4 eDrive35 G26

286 hp · 400 Nm · 2,000 kg · 2024

VS
TeslaBEVFaster

Model 3 Standard Range Plus

227 hp · 449 Nm · 1,655 kg · 2019

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW i4 eDrive35 G26

6.08 s

Gap0.27 sin favour of Model 3 Standard Range Plus
BTesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus

5.81 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
Measurei4 eDrive35 G26Model 3 Standard Range PlusGap
0–100 km/h6.08 s5.81 s0.27 s · Model 3 Standard Range Plus
400 m standing start14.38 s14.27 s0.11 s · Model 3 Standard Range Plus
1,000 m standing start26.26 s26.61 s0.35 s · i4 eDrive35 G26
Top speed (electronically limited)190 km/h224 km/h34 km/h · Model 3 Standard Range Plus
Power-to-weight ratio6.99 kg/hp7.29 kg/hpbetter ratio · i4 eDrive35 G26

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEVi4 eDrive35 G26
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel 3 Standard Range Plus
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
Stagei4 eDrive35 G26Model 3 Standard Range Plus
0–30 km/h1.69 s1.44 s
0–50 km/h2.81 s2.40 s
0–80 km/h4.56 s4.14 s
0–100 km/h6.08 s5.81 s
0–120 km/h8.04 s8.01 s · tight gap
0–160 km/h14.28 s15.57 s
0–200 km/h-32.27 s
400 m standing start14.38 s14.27 s · tight gap
1,000 m standing start26.26 s26.61 s
Top speed190 km/h224 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

i4 eDrive35 G26

6,99kg/hpratio better by 0,30 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power286 hpPending
Torque400 Nm
Weight2 000 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxAutomatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio
Tesla

Model 3 Standard Range Plus

7,29kg/hpcompensated by −345 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power227 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque449 Nm
Weight1 655 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus hits 100 km/h in 5.81 s versus 6.08 s for the i4 eDrive35. At this point, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus is doing 129 km/h against 131 km/h for the i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.26 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus crosses the line in 14.26 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The i4 eDrive35 maxes out at 190 km/h while the Model 3 Standard Range Plus keeps accelerating towards 224 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.07 s.

Around 529 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the i4 eDrive35 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 34 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the i4 eDrive35 finishes in 26.26 s versus 26.61 s. The 0.35 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i4 eDrive35 is capped at 190 km/h, the Model 3 Standard Range Plus at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.99 kg/hp vs 7.29 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.43 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of i4 eDrive35 G26
Xpeng P7
Instead of Model 3 Standard Range Plus
Xpeng P7iXpeng P7Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 RWD

VolvoVSTesla

V60 T8 AWD Recharge vs Model 3 Standard Range Plus

BMWVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Standard Range Plus

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Standard Range Plus wins (5,81 s vs 6,08 s).

i4 eDrive35 G26 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,08 seconds (calibrated simulation).

i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp. Model 3 Standard Range Plus: 227 hp, ratio 7,29 kg/hp.

i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h. Model 3 Standard Range Plus: 224 km/h.