Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive50 I20 wins (4,69 s vs 7,41 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | iX xDrive50 I20 | Atto 3 Extended Range | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.69 s | 7.41 s | 2.72 s · iX xDrive50 I20 |
| 400 m standing start | 12.93 s | 15.57 s | 2.64 s · iX xDrive50 I20 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.92 s | 29.20 s | 5.28 s · iX xDrive50 I20 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 160 km/h | 40 km/h · iX xDrive50 I20 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.94 kg/hp | 8.58 kg/hp | better ratio · iX xDrive50 I20 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | iX xDrive50 I20 | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.29 s | 1.96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.15 s | 3.27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.50 s | 5.43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.69 s | 7.41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.18 s | 10.03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.39 s | 19.03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.61 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12.93 s | 15.57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.92 s | 29.20 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 523 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 765 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 585 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the iX xDrive50 hits 100 km/h in 4.69 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. At this point, the iX xDrive50 leads by 2.72 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX xDrive50 is doing 144 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 1.77 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX xDrive50 crosses the line in 12.93 s versus 15.57 s. The 2.64 s gap represents roughly 104 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX xDrive50 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive50 finishes in 23.92 s versus 29.19 s, with a 5.27 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive50 is capped at 200 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.94 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 2.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive50 I20 wins (4,69 s vs 7,41 s).
iX xDrive50 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,69 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX xDrive50 I20: 523 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
iX xDrive50 I20: 200 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h.