Performance duelHome › Duel

BMW iX xDrive50 I20 vs Mercedes EQS 450 V297 : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

400 m
VMax
121
0 – 100 km/h
4.69s
1.61 s
iX
6.30s
400 m standing start
12.93s
1.63 s
iX
14.56s
Top speed
200
10 km/h
EQS
210
Power523 ch
Power333 ch
Torque765 Nm
Torque568 Nm
Weight2 585 kg
Weight2 480 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
DrivetrainEQS 450
GearboxAutomatic · 2-spee…
GearboxAutomatic · 2-spee…
Faster
BMW
iX xDrive50 I20
2023
4,69 s
200 km/h
Power523 ch
Torque765 Nm
Weight2 585 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
VMax
Mercedes
EQS 450 V297
2023
6,30 s
210 km/h
Power333 ch
Torque568 Nm
Weight2 480 kg
DrivetrainEQS 450
BMW iX xDrive50
2023 · ELECTRIC · 523 ch
Mercedes EQS 450
2023 · ELECTRIC · 333 ch
0-30 km/h1,29 s
0-50 km/h2,15 s
0-80 km/h3,50 s
0-100 km/h4,69 s
0-120 km/h6,18 s
0-160 km/h10,39 s
0-200 km/h16,61 s
400 m DA12,93 s
1 000 m DA23,92 s
VMax200 km/h
0-30 km/h1,62 s
0-50 km/h2,71 s
0-80 km/h4,57 s
0-100 km/h6,30 s
0-120 km/h8,51 s
0-160 km/h15,04 s
0-200 km/h25,02 s
400 m DA14,56 s
1 000 m DA26,38 s
VMax210 km/h
DQM91%
iX xDrive50
--
EQS 450
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 91%
400 m result
12.93s
BMW iX xDrive50
Gap
1.63s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
iX xDrive50
Gap
EQS 450
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
5.71 s
114 km/h
~19 m
4 long.
6.42 s
101 km/h
200 m
8.48 s
144 km/h
~37 m
8 long.
9.54 s
128 km/h
400 m
12.93 s
178 km/h
~70 m
15 long.
14.56 s
158 km/h
600 m
16.72 s
200 km/h
~102 m
22 long.
18.85 s
177 km/h
1,000 m
23.92 s
200 km/h
~137 m
30 long.
26.37 s
204 km/h

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 91 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



iX xDrive50 vs EQS 450: chronicle of a drag race at 210 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the iX xDrive50 hits 100 km/h in 4.69 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. At this point, the iX xDrive50 leads by 1.61 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the iX xDrive50 is doing 144 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 1.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the iX xDrive50 crosses the line in 12.93 s versus 14.56 s. The 1.63 s gap represents roughly 70 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the iX xDrive50 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive50 finishes in 23.92 s versus 26.37 s, with a 2.45 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 210 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive50 is capped at 200 km/h, the EQS 450 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.94 kg/hp vs 7.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 1.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

BMW iX xDrive50 has a clear edge over the Mercedes EQS 450 to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.