Over 0–100 km/h, iX3 G08 wins (6,86 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX3 G08 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,86 s−0,21 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,08 s−0,03 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s−0,55 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 226 km/h−46 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,64 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX3 G08 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,89 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,16 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,13 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,86 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,11 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,42 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,08 s | 15,11 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw iX3 hits 100 km/h in 6.86 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the Q7 SUV is 15 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 117 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 0.33 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw iX3 crosses the line in 15.07 s versus 15.11 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the Bmw iX3 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw iX3 finishes in 27.54 s versus 28.09 s, with a 0.55 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (226 km/h), the Q7 SUV never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw iX3 is capped at 180 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 0.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX3 G08 wins (6,86 s vs 7,07 s).
iX3 G08 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,86 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX3 G08: 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
iX3 G08: 180 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.