Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Sedan G80 wins (4,18 s vs 4,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M3 Sedan G80 | Cayenne S E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,18 s−0,46 s | 4,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,26 s−0,53 s | 12,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,95 s−1,31 s | 23,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 264 km/h−14 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,55 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M3 Sedan G80 | Cayenne S E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,20 s | 1,22 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,01 s | 2,04 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,29 s | 3,38 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,18 s | 4,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,53 s | 6,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,71 s | 10,10 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,11 s | 16,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,26 s | 12,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,95 s | 23,26 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Bmw M3 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 4.18 s versus 4.64 s for the Cayenne S. At this point, the Bmw M3 Sedan leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M3 Sedan is doing 154 km/h against 145 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 0.28 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M3 Sedan crosses the line in 12.25 s versus 12.79 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M3 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 202 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M3 Sedan finishes in 21.95 s versus 23.26 s, with a 1.31 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 264 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M3 Sedan is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne S at 264 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.55 kg/hp vs 4.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.94 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Sedan G80 wins (4,18 s vs 4,63 s).
M3 Sedan G80 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,18 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M3 Sedan G80: 480 hp, ratio 3,55 kg/hp. Cayenne S E3.1: 440 hp, ratio 4,59 kg/hp.
M3 Sedan G80: 250 km/h. Cayenne S E3.1: 264 km/h.