Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,24 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | M4 F82 | A110 GT 300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.24 s | 3.92 s | 0.32 s · A110 GT 300 |
| 400 m standing start | 12.38 s | 11.97 s | 0.41 s · A110 GT 300 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.29 s | 21.76 s | 0.53 s · A110 GT 300 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h | 22 km/h · A110 GT 300 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.54 kg/hp | 3.65 kg/hp | better ratio · M4 F82 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | M4 F82 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.14 s | 1.13 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.90 s | 1.89 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.25 s | 3.06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.24 s | 3.92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.70 s | 5.15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9.14 s | 8.21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14.04 s | 12.68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.38 s | 11.97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.29 s | 21.76 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.24 s for the M4. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.32 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 151 km/h for the M4. The gap is 0.26 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.38 s. The 0.41 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 22.29 s, with a 0.53 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the M4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.44 seconds. The 0.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,24 s).
M4 F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,24 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 F82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M4 F82: 250 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.