Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,24 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 F82 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s | 3,92 s+0,32 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s | 11,97 s+0,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s | 21,76 s+0,53 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 F82 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,25 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,70 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,14 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,04 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | A110 GT 300 | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.24 s for the Bmw M4. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.32 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 151 km/h for the Bmw M4. The gap is 0.26 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.38 s. The 0.41 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 22.29 s, with a 0.53 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.44 seconds. The 0.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,24 s).
M4 F82 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,24 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M4 F82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. A110 GT 300 : 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M4 F82 : 250 km/h. A110 GT 300 : 272 km/h.