Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 gagne (4,24 s vs 4,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 F82 | 750Ld xDrive G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s−0,39 s | 4,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s−0,46 s | 12,84 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s−0,89 s | 23,18 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 F82 | 750Ld xDrive G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,25 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,25 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s | 4,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,70 s | 6,14 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,14 s | 10,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,04 s | 16,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s | 12,84 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s | 23,18 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 980 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.24 s versus 4.63 s for the Bmw 750Ld xDrive. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 0.39 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 151 km/h against 145 km/h for the Bmw 750Ld xDrive. The gap is 0.28 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.38 s versus 12.84 s. The 0.46 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 22.29 s versus 23.18 s, with a 0.89 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 and the Bmw 750Ld xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 4.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.01 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 gagne (4,24 s vs 4,63 s).
M4 F82 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,24 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M4 F82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. 750Ld xDrive G11 : 400 hp, ratio 4,95 kg/hp.
M4 F82 : 250 km/h. 750Ld xDrive G11 : 250 km/h.