Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 gagne (4,19 s vs 6,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | A290 GT 160kW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s−2,17 s | 6,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s−2,42 s | 14,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s−4,89 s | 26,75 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+18 km/h | 232 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,78 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | A290 GT 160kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,76 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,94 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 4,77 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 6,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 8,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 15,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 29,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 14,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 26,75 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 232 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 479 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | A290 GT 160kW | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 6.36 s for the A290 GT 160kW. Despite lacking instant torque, 480 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 2.17 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 129 km/h for the A290 GT 160kW. The gap is 1.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 14.65 s. The 2.42 s gap represents roughly 102 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 26.75 s, with a 4.90 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.74 seconds. The 2.17 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 gagne (4,19 s vs 6,36 s).
M4 G82 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,19 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M4 G82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. A290 GT 160kW : 218 hp, ratio 6,78 kg/hp.
M4 G82 : 250 km/h. A290 GT 160kW : 232 km/h.