Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 wins (3,83 s vs 5,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition F82 | A290 GTS 192kW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−1,69 s | 5,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s−2,20 s | 13,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s−4,29 s | 25,18 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+3 km/h | 247 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,67 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition F82 | A290 GTS 192kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,59 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,66 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 4,28 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 5,51 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,79 s | 7,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,46 s | 12,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 22,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s | 13,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s | 25,18 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 247 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 261 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 479 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the M4 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 5.52 s for the A290 GTS 192kW. Despite lacking instant torque, 510 hp of power compensates. At this point, the M4 Competition leads by 1.69 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M4 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 138 km/h for the A290 GTS 192kW. The gap is 1.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M4 Competition crosses the line in 11.61 s versus 13.81 s. The 2.20 s gap represents roughly 98 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M4 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 185 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M4 Competition finishes in 20.89 s versus 25.18 s, with a 4.29 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 247 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the M4 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.16 seconds. The 1.69 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 wins (3,83 s vs 5,51 s).
M4 Competition F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Competition F82: 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp. A290 GTS 192kW: 261 hp, ratio 5,67 kg/hp.
M4 Competition F82: 250 km/h. A290 GTS 192kW: 247 km/h.