Over 0–100 km/h, M5 Competition F90 wins (3,33 s vs 5,98 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | M5 Competition F90 | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.33 s | 5.98 s | 2.65 s · M5 Competition F90 |
| 400 m standing start | 11.11 s | 14.27 s | 3.16 s · M5 Competition F90 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.22 s | 26.41 s | 6.19 s · M5 Competition F90 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 230 km/h | 20 km/h · M5 Competition F90 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2.98 kg/hp | 6.23 kg/hp | better ratio · M5 Competition F90 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | M5 Competition F90 | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.01 s | 1.31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.68 s | 2.11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.63 s | 4.09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.33 s | 5.98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.12 s | 8.25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6.67 s | 15.16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10.30 s | 28.87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.11 s | 14.27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.22 s | 26.41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the M5 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 5.98 s for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. At this point, the M5 Competition leads by 2.65 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M5 Competition is doing 168 km/h against 127 km/h for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 1.90 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M5 Competition crosses the line in 11.11 s versus 14.27 s. The 3.16 s gap represents roughly 130 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M5 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 234 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M5 Competition finishes in 20.21 s versus 26.41 s, with a 6.19 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the M5 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 2.65 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 Competition F90 wins (3,33 s vs 5,98 s).
M5 Competition F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 Competition F90: 625 hp, ratio 2,98 kg/hp. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
M5 Competition F90: 250 km/h. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.